Stress reactions and health problems in hospital personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic-A longitudinal, multicenter study

Background: The overarching aim of the study was to (1) investigate how working with COVID-19 patients has impacted work environment, and (2) to identify how factors in the work environment impact adverse health outcomes among hospital personnel (HP), throughout the four waves of the pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): In a web-based survey altogether 2472 HP participated from four large university hospitals in Norway, whereof N = 680 in April-June 2020 (T1), N = 1073 in December-January 2020/2021 (T2), N = 818 in April-May 2021 (T3), and N = 972 in December 2021-February 2022 (T4). At each time point participants reported on pandemic related work tasks, work environment and adverse health outcomes. Somatic symptoms, psychological distress, posttraumatic stress symptoms and burnout served as outcomes of multivariable linear regression models. The percentage of responders involved in ICU treatment of COVID-19 patients varied between 21% and 40% from T1-T4. Result(s): Reported stressors altered in strength during the 4 waves. Preliminary results indicate that exposure to patients with COVID-19 was associated with more frequent experience of work environmental factors. Compared to colleagues not working with patients with COVID-19 HP reported challenges related to professional competency and training, predictability in teams and work environment, manageable workload, adequate help and support for work stress management, user-friendliness of Personal Protection Equipment and infection protection safety. Furthermore, these environmental factors were associated with symptoms of psychological unhealth on at least one timepoint. Conclusion(s): The results may help guide organizational efforts to maintain professional competency and to reduce stress more efficiently among hospital personnel at different stages in response to long-term crises.

Turnover Intention Model: Self- Determination Theory Approach: Acces la Success

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the influence of mental workload and person-organization fit on turnover intention, using basic psychological needs frustration (BPNF) as the intervening variable in the hospital in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The sample of this study is vocational nurse in the hospital in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The sample is carried out through survey from 153 respondents, which is processed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method. This study finds that mental workload does not have direct influence on turnover intention, but it is mediated (full mediation) by need for competence frustration and need for relatedness frustration. Person-organization fit has a positive influence on need for autonomy frustration. However, person-organization fit does not have an influence on turnover intention, and basic psychological needs does not mediate the relationship of these variables. This study also found that the category of mental workload is quite low, person-organization fit is low, basic psychological needs frustration is quite low, and turnover intention is low. Nurse has the extrinsic motivation of identified regulation, thus hospital leaders should bring their motivation from identified regulation to intrinsic motivation, through internalization by establishing supportive work environment, namely Islamic spiritual workplace (ISW), with basic psychological needs supporting in each of its dimension. This study is expected to be a reference for practitioners in human resource management, especially regarding human resource retention function through the implementation of ISW. ISW contributes to lower mental workload, the increase of person-organization fit, establishment of basic psychological need satisfaction, as well as the decrease of basic psychological needs frustration and turnover intention.

Workplace violence and associations with health outcomes in public health administration agencies in Taiwan: a survey during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of workplace violence in public health administration agencies and its effects on health outcomes. Methods: A survey was conducted in March 2022. Staff who had been working for at least one year in the Ministry of Health and Welfare or its subordinate agencies, the Department of Health, or in public health centers were recruited. Data were collected anonymously with a structured, online questionnaire. A total of 492 valid questionnaires were collected. Results: A total of 48.17% participants reported having experienced workplace violence (physical, psychological, verbal, or sexual). The most common type of violence was verbal (43.50%), followed by psychological (31.71%). Supervisors were the primary perpetrators of verbal and psychological violence, followed by clients and colleagues. Staff reported long working hours and high levels of psychological and physical stress. Furthermore, 22.97% of workers reported poor self-rated health, 60.57% had personal burnout levels higher than 50, and 63.41% reported poor mental health. Regression analyses showed that low workplace justice was most strongly associated with internal verbal and psychological violence, whereas routine work requiring interaction with the public was most strongly associated with external verbal violence. Staff who had experienced workplace violence in the past year had significantly higher risks of poor self-rated health, mental health, and personal burnout, and poor health was more strongly associated with workplace violence that originated inside the organization than with workplace violence that originated from outside the organization. Conclusions: This survey was conducted on-line anonymously, so the representativeness of our findings might be limited. However, heavy workloads and workplace violence in public health administration agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic are important issues deserving urgent attention. (Taiwan J Public Health. 2023;42(1) :42-61)

What are the mental health issues of postpartum mothers during a pandemic? A scoping review

Background. Postpartum mothers' mental health has a significant role in mothers' well-being and child's growth and develop-ment. This issue is worsened during a pandemic when social restrictions are regulated, resulting in perceived stress, baby blues, postpartum depression, and other mental health issues. Objective. This study intends to investigate postpartum moth-ers' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This study's methodology is a scoping review using the prism-ScR checklist, the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool, and a population, exposure, outcome framework. It uses 4 databases: Pubmed, Willey, Proquest, and ScienceDirect;its inclusion criteria is original English articles that can be accessed in full text between 2020 and 2022. Results. Out of 190 publications, we found 7 that are pertinent to the research goals. Qualitative research, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies make up the research. The mapping result includes 4 themes: the types of mental health problems experi-enced by postpartum moms during the Pandemic, risk and predic-tive factors, postpartum mothers' experiences, and the effects of mothers' mental health problems. Conclusion. After giving birth, most mothers experience stress, anxiety, and depression. Postpartum mental health concerns are influenced by isolation, social exclusion, and crises. The cre-ation of a customized plan for early assistance for a woman's mental health requirements, as well as the establishment of an accessi-ble mental health provider, including medical personnel and medical facilities, is advised for pregnant and postpartum women. only.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.

Impact of Covid-19 on Mental Health among Medical Students

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is a major health crisis affecting several nations. Such widespread outbreaks are associated with adverse mental health consequences. Objective(s): To conduct a survey-based assessment of mental health among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aimed at identifying severity levels of depression and anxiety, stressors related to the pandemic, and barriers students experienced in handling the pandemic-related stress. Method(s): An analytical cross-sectional study was chosen as the study design for this research to study the association between demographic social and mental health among medical students during the pandemic COVID-19. Result(s): The results of this study were collected by respondents through questionnaires as the respondents were needed to answer about 16 questions and the main question was asked mostly about their mental health condition during the pandemic COVID-19. 101 respondents participated in the study. Discussion(s): the impact of COVID-19 on mental health among medical students has been studied. Due to the long-lasting pandemic situation and numerous measures such as lockdown and stay-at-home orders, COVID-19 brings negative impacts on higher education of medical students, self and social isolation, disconnection from friends and teachers resulting in more medical students than ever experiencing feelings of helplessness, isolation, grief, anxiety and depression. The issue of mental health is not only relevant but crucial. Demand for health support services has increased exponentially as a result. Conclusion(s): In this study, severity levels of depression and anxiety, stressors related to the pandemic, and barriers students experienced in handling the pandemic-related stress have increased due to many factors such as social isolation, own health and the health of loved ones, financial difficulties, suicidal thoughts, depressive thoughts, class workload, changes in living environment, eating patterns and sleeping habits.Copyright © RJPT. All right reserved.

ELASTIC: Edge Workload Forecasting based on Collaborative Cloud-Edge Deep Learning

With the rapid development of edge computing in the post-COVID19 pandemic period, precise workload forecasting is considered the basis for making full use of the edge limited resources, and both edge service providers (ESPs) and edge service consumers (ESCs) can benefit significantly from it. Existing paradigms of workload forecasting (i.e., edge-only or cloud-only) are improper, due to failing to consider the inter-site correlations and might suffer from significant data transmission delays. With the increasing adoption of edge platforms by web services, it is critical to balance both accuracy and efficiency in workload forecasting. In this paper, we propose ELASTIC, which is the first study that leverages a cloud-edge collaborative paradigm for edge workload forecasting with multi-view graphs. Specifically, at the global stage, we design a learnable aggregation layer on each edge site to reduce the time consumption while capturing the inter-site correlation. Additionally, at the local stage, we design a disaggregation layer combining both the intra-site correlation and inter-site correlation to improve the prediction accuracy. Extensive experiments on realistic edge workload datasets collected from China's largest edge service provider show that ELASTIC outperforms state-of-the-art methods, decreases time consumption, and reduces communication cost. © 2023 ACM.

Burnout and Wellbeing during the Second Covid-19 Wave: Are There Differences between Medical Specialties?

Introduction: Burnout is common amongst clinical staff. Critical Care is widely accepted to have amongst the highest rates, with an incidence of >38%.1 The Covid-19 pandemic placed unprecedented pressures on staff, making them vulnerable to burnout.2 Although stressors were similar across medical teams, we suspected there were differences in burnout between medical specialties. Objective(s): This study aimed to examine burnout amongst the hospital MDT, focussing on three higher care clinical areas: Coronary Care (CCU), Respiratory (RSU) and Critical Care (ICU) and identify recurring positive and negative experiences. Method(s): Between March and April 2021 staff were invited to complete a two-part survey. Part one investigated demographic data and free text answers on feelings towards Covid-19. Part two questioned recipients on the 22 questions of the MBI -HSS (Maslach Burnout Index- Human Services Survey).3 This survey assesses burn-out in three domains: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalisation (DP), and lack of Personal Accomplishment (PA). MBI-HSS results were analysed and a previously used 'high-risk' cut-off was used to calculate percentages per domain and overall. Free text analysis was conducted by two researchers to identify common themes, protective factors and negative factors which may increase burnout. Result(s): 148 staff members responded to the survey: 53% of respondents met the criteria for burnout in at least one domain. 58% of ICU staff, 42% of RSU staff and 44% of CCU staff were burnt out in one domain or more. ICU had the highest percentage of staff at high risk of EE and lack of PA. RSU had the highest percentage of staff scoring highly for DP. Free text analysis demonstrated some positive experiences from the Covid-19 pandemic: teamwork, communication, resilience, and opportunities to learn new skills were highlighted by staff across all areas. All areas found staffing and workload a negative factor. In ICU, workspace organisation and long shifts in PPE were key stressors which made communication and taking breaks safely difficult. Managing stress and uncertainty were highlighted by the ICU teams. In RSU, a significant proportion of staff found the lack of established treatments and poor outcomes difficult to manage, potentially highlighting the differences in Covid-19 management compared with ICU. As nursing staff work with higher ratios in RSU, some found managing patients' needs difficult: "Not having enough time to care for patients' basic needs . . . patients in side-rooms were left feeling isolated and scared". In CCU, there was a shift towards fear of catching the virus, PPE provision and poor infection control guidance, possibly arising from lower exposure to Covid-19: "It felt like the trust didn't give a s**t about their staff with regard to PPE and vaccinations." Conclusion(s): All clinical areas highlighted increased teamwork as a positive outcome of the Covid-19 pandemic, and good relationships have been built, a known protective factor against burnout. Many negative factors have impacted the rate of burnout, including high workload, staffing issues, redeployment and managing death and uncertainty. We hope to resurvey the same areas to assess wellbeing one year on, and address key factors to improve wellbeing.

Overcoming COVID-19 pandemic: emerging challenges of human factors and the role of cognitive ergonomics

The present study, an expert review, aimed to discuss the emerging challenges of overcoming COVID-19 from the perspective of human factors and the importance of cognitive ergonomics in helping to cope with the epidemic. Identifying these challenges and the use of cognitive ergonomics to optimize human well-being and system performance can be effective in managing COVID-19. Generally, two main preventive approaches such as social distancing and patient care or treatment approaches are being utilized in response to COVID-19. In this paper, human factors challenges that could emerge from covid-19 preventive approaches were discussed. Social distancing forces presence and increases automated systems that lead to increases in cognitive needs, mental workload, stress, etc. Challenges of treatment and health care include the increased workload of healthcare personnel, stress, changing work systems and task allocation that led to fatigue and stress, threats to patient safety, and disruption of interpersonal interactions from a cognitive ergonomic perspective. It is concluded that the challenges of coping with COVID-19 were numerous and important from the perspective of human factors and the role of cognitive ergonomics is important in controlling the disease;hence, it should be taken into consideration.

The Association of Bedside Nurse Staffing on Patient Outcomes and Throughput in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Health care throughput is the progression of patients from admission to discharge, limited by bed occupancy and hospital capacity. This study examines heart center throughput, cascading effects of limited beds, transfer delays, and nursing staffing on outcomes utilizing elective surgery cancellation during the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic wave. This study was a retrospective single-center study of staffing, adverse events, and transfers. The study period was January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 with the SARS-CoV-2 period March to May 2020. There were 2,589 patients, median age 5 months (6 days-4 years), 1,543 (60%) surgical and 1,046 (40%) medical. Mortality was 3.9% ( n = 101), median stay 5 days (3-11 days), median 1:1 nurse staffing 40% (33-48%), median occupancy 54% (43-65%) for step-down unit, and 81% (74-85%) for cardiac intensive care unit. Every 10% increase in step-down unit occupancy had a 0.5-day increase in cardiac intensive care unit stay ( p = 0.044), 2.1% increase in 2-day readmission ( p = 0.023), and 2.6% mortality increase ( p < 0.001). Every 10% increase in cardiac intensive care unit occupancy had 3.4% increase in surgical delay ( p = 0.016), 6.5% increase in transfer delay ( p = 0.020), and a 15% increase in total reported adverse events ( p < 0.01). Elective surgery cancellation is associated with reduced high occupancy days (23-10%, p < 0.001), increased 1:1 nursing (34-55%, p < 0.001), decreased transfer delays (19-4%, p = 0.008), and decreased mortality (3.7-1.5%, p = 0.044). In conclusion, Elective surgery cancellation was associated with increased 1:1 nursing and decreased mortality. Increased cardiac step-down unit occupancy was associated with longer cardiac intensive care unit stay, increased transfer, and surgical delays.

Psychological impact of the covid-19 pandemic on health care professionals: A cross sectional analysis of three sets of data

Aims: Health Care Workers (HCW) have had to deal with mental health-related stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic and exhibited higher rates of anxiety, depression, insomnia, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of a sample of hospital HCWs was assessed over time, relating to quality of life, post-traumatic growth, burnout, sleep changes, and resilience. Method(s): An online, three-phase, survey was sent to the whole working population of the University Hospital of Modena, covering 12 months (baseline questionnaire sent in June 2020). Sociodemographic and behavioral information related to COVID-19 were collected, together with screening for anxiety, depression, stress, and post-traumatic symptoms. A multivariate analysis was conducted to analyze changes across time. Result(s): 457 HCWs completed all three stages of the survey, M/F ratio: 28.0/71.9%. Anxiety and stress were significantly associated to having been in direct charge of COVID+ patients (anxiety OR = 2.22, 95% C.I. = 1.06-4.78, p-value = 0.04;stress OR = 2.03, 95% C.I. = 1.05-3.95, p-value = 0.04). Stress was associated to perception of increased workload both at baseline (OR = 1.79, 95% C.I. = 1.02-3.18, p-value = 0.05) and at first follow-up (OR = 1.97, 95% C.I. = 1.08-3.73, p-value = 0.03). Significant changes over time were registered as to increased alcohol consumption and a more imbalanced diet. Conclusion(s): Results are helpful to guide support interventions and organizational actions to improve the well-being and functioning of HCWs.Copyright © 2023

Counselor educator workload and burnout in the era of covid-19

The COVID-19 pandemic brought disruption to teaching and other aspects of workload in higher education. The current study sampled 126 counselor educators about workload, compassion satisfaction, burnout, and job satisfaction. Results indicated that faculty workload and administrative responsibilities increased for counselor educators during the pandemic without adequate compensation or support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Nurse perception on ECMO care: A literature review

Objectives: The nursing care is more complex in relation to new technologies, new diseases, new globally emergencies. In relation to technology, nurses acquired more competences in relation to advanced therapy, in respiratory, circulatory, and renal support. The nursing workload increases in complexity and in responsibilities, without a staff increasing in relation to nursing activities. ECMO was widely applied to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome and circulatory failure, in case of cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock, configuring as a therapy bridge to decision, to restore, to transplant or to nowhere. During the last years, nurses were involved to a rapid and continuous changing, to respond adequately to new health challenges, understanding or not their role and responsibilities in globally health care system. Nurse manages different variables, well represented by nursing activities score, but in nursing ECMO care, these variables are more complicated, in relation to ECMO device and to ECMO patient. What is the globally perception of nurses involved in ECMO care? Methods: A literature review was applied on PubMed. The inclusion criteria were all articles about ECMO, including pediatric and/or adult population, with a publication less than ten years. Result(s): A total of sixteen articles were found, with reduction to ten for relevance. The excluded articles talked about non ECMO care or patient;s perceptions. Articles included in the research talk about nursing perceptions (40%), education (30%), ethics in ECMO care (20%), professional experience in ECMO Covid (10%). Conclusion(s): The nursing perception on ECMO nursing care are different. They recognize the central role in ECMO care, but over workload, without staff increasing, less peer support, a low teamwork and personal differences in technical and non-technical skills increase some barriers to nursing perception of themselves. Nurses allocate their competence on experience and continuous training, but also a good teamwork and a professional recognition by other health care professions or by nursing supervisors can increase nursing perception and reduce the abandonment of nursing profession.

"working in the dark but expected to be an expert": Reflecting on critical care preparations for COVID-19

Introduction: Before spring 2020, many healthcare organisations did not possess detailed plans for the expansion and delivery of critical care during a pandemic. Furthermore, there was little directly-relevant individual or institutional experience to draw upon. Local, national and international guidance was drawn up rapidly and subject to frequent revision.1 Reflecting on these challenges, we designed a study to explore critical care and anaesthetic doctors' experiences of preparation for the provision of critical care services in the first wave of COVID-19. Objective(s): 1. To establish what factors facilitated and hindered the expansion and delivery of critical care services. 2. To identify important learning points for the provision of critical care during future pandemics. Method(s): We conducted semi-structured interviews with medical staff from the anaesthesia and critical care departments of our hospital, a tertiary centre with general and cardiothoracic intensive care units, including an ECMO service. We classified participants into two groups;1. Decision makers - individuals instrumental in shaping the critical care response, e.g., clinical directors and college tutors. 2. Staff members - clinicians working within the departments, including consultants and trainees. Thirteen interviews were conducted with 15 participants: eight decision makers and seven staff members. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and anonymised. We manually coded transcripts, and carried out an inductive thematic analysis.2 Results: Eight themes were generated from our analysis: * Problem solving with simulation: simulation exercises allowed experienced clinicians to troubleshoot practical issues and helped staff to prepare for unfamiliar tasks. * A sense of togetherness: staff reported that the "all hands-on deck" ethos was protective against fatigue, although this was short-lived. * Delayed and changing guidance: frequent guideline changes created confusion and anxiety. * Leading from the front: leaders with a clinical role were perceived more positively than those operating at a distance from the "shop-floor". * Coordination, collaboration and compromise: departments that accommodated each other's needs fostered productive inter-departmental relationships. * Insecure supply chains: staff took their own measures to ensure PPE availability, including acquisition of items outside NHS supply chains. * Constant communication: rapid methods of personal communication, e.g., WhatsApp were effective, although "WhatsApp fatigue" was endemic. * Balancing skill mix and fatigue: flux in workload required dynamic staff allocation. Underutilised staff groups created frustration and low morale in overworked colleagues. Conclusion(s): The threat to health and society from pandemic events is expected to increase over time.3 We should take this opportunity to gather experiences from those involved in the COVID-19 pandemic to guide future preparations. In early 2020, decision makes in local hospitals were operating with unclear guidance from external agencies. Our data, obtained in the summer of 2021 demonstrates that individual and departmental reflections had already resulted in processes being refined in later waves of COVID-19. Whilst the exact nature of future pandemics will vary, some elements of preparation will remain consistent. We recommend that plans for pandemic management should aim to reduce workload and target the most effective interventions, including by addressing the themes outlined above.

Workload, work–life interface, stress, job satisfaction and job performance: a job demand–resource model study during COVID-19

Purpose: This study, using a comprehensive job demand–resources (JD-R) model, aims to explore the pressures of workload, work–life interface and subsequent impacts on employee stress and job satisfaction, with implications for employee job performance, in the context of working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach: A cross-sectional sample of employees at seven universities (n = 4,497) and structural equation path analysis regression models are used for the analyses. Findings: The results show that a partial mediation JD-R model was supported, where job demands (such as workload and actual hours worked) and job resources (including expectations, support and job security) have relationships with work interference with personal life and personal life interference with work. These have subsequent negative path relationships with stress. Further, stress is negatively related to job satisfaction, and job satisfaction is positively related to employee job performance. Practical implications: Potential policy implications include mitigation approaches to addressing some of the negative impacts on workers and to enhance the positive outcomes. Timely adjustments to job demands and resources can aid in sustaining balance for workers in an uncertain and fluid environmental context. Originality/value: This study makes a contribution to knowledge by capturing sentiments on working arrangements, perceived changes and associated outcomes during a key period within the COVID-19 pandemic while being one of the rare studies to focus on a comprehensive JD-R model and a unique context of highly educated workers' transition to working from home. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of International Journal of Manpower is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Factors influencing sonographer-led bowel ultrasound service

The aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing UK sonographers' practice of adult bowel ultrasound. A mixed-method online questionnaire was designed and shared on social media platforms in April 2021. Research restrictions due to COVID19 limited the sample size permitted. Convenience sampling recruited thirty UK sonographers performing adult abdominal ultrasound in their practice. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Quantitative data revealed that 53% (n= 16) of the participants expressed a lack of confidence in scanning the bowel, while 77%, (n = 23) indicated a high level of interest in training in bowel ultrasound. Although 63.3% (n = 19) of the participants reported a high level of confidence in scanning the bowel for suspected appendicitis, the majority (70%, n = 21) expressed lack of confidence in examining the bowel for other pathologies like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inductive thematic analysis of qualitative data revealed that the participants had varying opinions on this topic. Emerging themes included training opportunities, preference of other imaging modalities, management challenges, sonographers, and radiologists' influence. Qualitative results suggested that factors influencing sonographer evaluation of the bowel include advanced levels of training, a high degree of support from radiologists, regular bowel ultrasound lists, audits, and feedback from clinicians. Based on the findings of this study, most sonographers are not confident in practising bowel ultrasound beyond the evaluation of suspected appendicitis. Surveyed sonographers were interested in expanding their roles into other areas of bowel ultrasound like examining for Crohn's and ulcerative colitis. Sonographer role extension into this area of practice is limited by various factors like chronic shortage of sonographers, increasing workload, limited training, and the perception of diminishing support from radiologists. We recommend a future study that is not limited by a small sample size.

Appropriateness of musculoskeletal soft tissue swelling ultrasound scans

This audit's purpose was to assess the appropriateness of referrals from primary and secondary care for soft tissue lumps and bumps ultrasounds (US) that are being performed in a university teaching hospital imaging department and compare against the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) national guidelines. This is on the background of increasing referrals for ultrasound scans of soft tissue lumps with limited clinical information in the face of increasing workload in the imaging department. This was a retrospective study, analysing data for all US performed for soft tissue swelling - over a one-month period. We focused on all US undertaken in the imaging department for June 2019 (pre-COVID) allowing for a 24 month follow-up period. Indications and findings were recorded. The requests were assessed regarding appropriateness by comparing to NICE and BSG guidelines. 200 ultrasound scans were undertaken during the one month period;14 paediatric patients were excluded from the data. The majority of referrals were from primary care (92%). Of the 186 cases analysed, 102 cases (54%) did not contain any appropriate clinical information as per the guidelines and no descriptive features were mentioned. Of the 81 cases (44%) that did contain relevant clinical information, 14 cases (17%) mentioned clinical features that, according to the guidelines, did not require ultrasound imaging and hence were also inappropriate. This audit shows the significant proportion of inappropriate requests from primary care. There was a lack of relevant clinical information on requests for US soft tissue, making it difficult to ascertain which patients need to be offered a direct access US in the required twoweek time frame. Considerations for improving the quality of referrals include presenting the audit within primary care teams to enhance referrer education and ratifying an US request system with a flowsheet proforma to ameliorate the referral process.

Implementation and recommendation of postpartum visit methods during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study from Indonesia

Background. The Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) in Indonesia is still a health problem that must be solved. In 2018 and 2019, the postpartum period still dominates maternal mortality in Surabaya. The postpartum visit method is one of the essential things that can affect postpartum services, so it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of the postpartum visit method and recommend visiting methods to improve maternal health. Objective.The study explores the implementation and recommendation of postpartum visit methods during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Materials and Methods. It used a qualitative research type by assessing the interview and observation dept. The instruments used are questionnaires and observation sheets. Researchers conducted interviews with 14 mothers who had completed the postpartum period, five midwives, a stakeholder in the health office and two experts in the field of maternal health. The data is processed using organizing, reduction, coding, description, linking between themes, and data interpretation. Results. Offline visits to health facilities still dominate the implementation of the postpartum visit method. The recommended postpartum visit method combines visits to health facilities, home visits, and telehealth. Besides that, it is necessary to consider maternal postpartum services up to 3 months after delivery, especially for postpartum mothers who have problems. Conclusion. The postpartum visit method during the COVID-19 pandemic, has not run optimally because there are restrictions on offline visits. However, it has not been supported by online monitoring or home visits.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.

Digital follow-up in obstetric anaesthesia

Introduction: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and in order to maintain essential operations in a socially distanced environment, many services in healthcare have undergone significant change, moving towards telemedicine solutions. This has ranged from virtual GP consultations to virtual examinations for post-graduate students. Telemedicine solutions are unlikely to provide a wholesale replacement for face-to-face patient interaction without significant deficiencies, however, they do herald new hybrid ways of working, allowing service providers to reach clients where they are. Anaesthetic followup for Obstetric clients who have undergone an anaesthetic intervention is a national recommendation by RCOA [1] and AAGBI/OAA [2]. The aim of this QI project was to launch a digital follow-up survey for Obstetric clients who underwent an anaesthetic intervention which could be utilised in a busy unit where staff shortage or high clinical workload often preclude daily face-to-face follow up. Method(s): We created a digital clients survey which is accessed by scanning a QR code. With the support of senior midwifery coordinators, large posters advertising the survey and QR code were put up in each client bay on the post-natal ward and flyers with QR codes were given to clients. Midwives reminded post-natal clients to complete the survey. We included a flyer with the QR code in discharge paperwork. The survey included an option to request a face-to face anaesthetic review. Result(s): During the trial period of three weeks, 87 inpatient and discharged post-natal clients responded via the digital follow-up tool. Discussion(s): Digital follow-up can provide an invaluable supplemental source of follow-up, supporting conventional follow-up methods and facilitating safe fast-track discharge. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

Anxiety and work overload perception levels of primary healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has greatly affected healthcare workers at the physical and psychosocial level. In this process, primary healthcare workers have taken the most active role by taking part in the filiation groups. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the anxiety and workload perception level of primary healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. An online survey was conducted among 197 healthcare workers. Personal Information Form, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale and Work Overload Scale were used as data collection tools in the research. Independent Two-Sample T-Test, One-Way Analysis of Variance, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test were used to evaluate the data. Moreover, the relationships between the scales were evaluated with Pearson correlation analysis and simple regression analysis. RESULTS: The median total score of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale of healthcare workers was 3.0, and the mean score of the Work Overload Scale was 37.89±7.47. It was found that there was a correlation between the Coronavirus Anxiety and the Work Overload Scales and 21.0% of the variance changes in the Work Overload Scale were affected by coronavirus anxiety. CONCLUSION: It was determined that the level of coronavirus anxiety affects the perception of workload. Therefore, it is recommended that work plans should be made considering this situation.